(No, this is not a personal issue for me)
Bonus: I can think of a popular 80's movie where a male character had this condition?can you name it? Hints: Actor, William Hurt; top-selling soundtrack for baby-boomers
I don't think there are too many men out there where this is applicable, so I'm thinking either:
1) It's just too weird or inconvenient
2) why bother when there are so many other men out there who are normal
3) You don't enjoy the other forms of penetration
4) You enjoy giving oral too much (or it's been your experience that you won't get without first giving)
Which is the primary reason for you?
Inspired by a couple of answers to this question:
answers.yahoo.com/question/index;?
If he still has the use of his fingers and tongue, it's not an issue for me, as long as he gets some sort of satisfaction from the encounter. if he's willing to play with toys, that's good too, again as long as he gets some sort of satisfaction.
It's not a good experience for me if I think that he's pleasing me as a chore he needs to take care of.
I really don't have any idea of what movie you're referencing, I'm not a big movie watcher.
Well, it wouldn't really be an issue in any other aspect besides sex. but, given that I am in my sexual prime (and will continue to be until I am well into my 80's LOL) this could be a major problem regarding infidelity?or we could take out major stocks in the pharmaceutical company that produces viagra cuz I would be slipping that majorly into every food and beverage he would be consuming!
Probably it would be. I don't think any of your reasons are right for me. I guess we have this idea of what is 'normal sex' and that means both parties are having their needs met.
Back when 'The Big Chill" was made treatments were absent (experimental or none) for ED. Viagra was a heart medicine and the erections in males is a side effect not why the drug was originally developed.
Because I'm shallow and I want sex.
Though that would be if we first started dating. Would probably have to break it off, and I'd feel hella guilty. Depends how good it was in other areas. if it was somebody I'd already been dating for a while and then the condition arose, I'd be more committed to working through it
Because I love sex a lot & I want it everyday and if it were my husband that it happens to that's one thing, but I sure wouldn't start off a relationship that way.
If he was a good guy that I really cared about the erectile dyfunction wouldn't matter at all especially if he was the type that aimed to please 
It'd be unfortunate, but since we do it lots of different ways, it wouldn't be an issue, unless he could never get off. I like it when we both get ours.
It would obviously be very inconvenient.
Yes, it would be a deal breaker. It would not last.
Because I wouldn't be able to have sex with him, of course!
It would only be an issue for me if it were an issue for him. By that, I mean if the guy has super low self-esteem and just can't get over it, the relationship can't go anywhere because the poor guy is more concerned with berating himself than pursuing a relationship.
There's more to sex than just a penis. The guy can get a strap-on or use his hands/mouth, or we can get toys. my actual concern would be how to please HIM. I just listed that you can use more than just a penis to please a woman, but for a man who can't get it up, how does he get pleased? I'd probably try a lot of holistic cures if Western Medicine has given up on men like him for the time being and hope something worked so that he could get something out of the experience, too. The only thing I would be able to think of is giving his flaccid penis oral stimulation while manually stimulating his prostate. perhaps the double stimulation would at least cause him pleasure, even if he couldn't ejaculate.
Sex isn't a deal maker or deal breaker for me, it's the person and his personality. if he's willing to explore, then so am I. All relationships take work to function.
Is this ladies only? Sex is a lot more satisfying with his rod, than with a fake. a false one would be a huge sacrifice against my sexual satifaction. why go through that for a mere date? It would be differant if this happened to a man I loved, and had a long term relationship with.
Edit: I like hanables idea of a strap on for men. I think a prosthetic cap would make the relationship a lot more viable than a relationship limited to other kinds of sex, or hand held tools. I'd still need to know that he enjoyed it though.
Tags: untreatable erectile dysfunction, encounter, satisfaction, yahooTrackbacks are closed, but you can .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.